Differences between revisions 6 and 7
Revision 6 as of 2008-09-23 12:17:51
Size: 4124
Editor: jrg
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2008-09-24 11:22:08
Size: 4116
Editor: jrg
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:
 Tasks adressed:: ["TaskD.4"], ["TaskD.6"], ["TaskD.7"]  Tasks adressed:: ["TaskD.6"]
Line 27: Line 27:
 Time estimated:: 8md  Time estimated:: 5md
Line 45: Line 45:
 Status:: Description needs review  Status:: Not started
Line 68: Line 68:
 * White Paper (''medium priority'')
  A "product specification", not for developers or end-users, illustrating high-level architecture
  - an overview of capabilities for non-technical people.
 * Data Model Language documentation - per link to already written wiki-pages (''medium priority'')
Line 73: Line 69:
  * PID generator webservice (including WSDL)
  * File Characterization webservice (including WSDL)
  * Search webservice (including WSDL)
  * Bitstorage webservice (including WSDL)
  * Fedora API-M (?)
  * LDAP AP
I (?)
 * Design Documentation (''low priorit
y'')
  *
Fedora setup and use
  * Summa integration (digital object bundle, OAI, playback disseminators)
  * GUI developer documentation
  * Validation tool documentation
  * PID generator webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
  * File Characterization webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
  * Search webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
  * Bitstorage webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
  * Fedora API-M (Including Fedora documentation as well as in what ways Fedora should be used)
Line 90: Line 80:
 * White Paper (1 md)
 * Data Model Language documentation (0 md)
 * Documentation of APIs (2 md)
 * Design Documentation (4 md)
 * Documentation of APIs (4 md)
Line 96: Line 83:
Total: 8 md Total: 5 md
Line 99: Line 86:



The following have been punted:
 * White Paper (''medium priority'')
  A "product specification", not for developers or end-users, illustrating high-level architecture
  - an overview of capabilities for non-technical people.
 * Documentation of:
  * LDAP API
 * Design Documentation (''low priority'')
  * Fedora setup and use
  * Summa integration (digital object bundle, OAI, playback disseminators)
  * GUI developer documentation
  * Validation tool documentation

Action System Documentation

Assigned
JRG

Prev assigned

Tasks adressed
["TaskD.6"]

Time estimated
5md

Time used
0md

Priority
4

Status
Not started

Iteration
13

Notes

The system documentation should contain:

  • Documentation of APIs (high priority)

    • PID generator webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
    • File Characterization webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
    • Search webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
    • Bitstorage webservice (including WSDL from "Action WSDL2 Java")
    • Fedora API-M (Including Fedora documentation as well as in what ways Fedora should be used)

The documentation should be delivered to and reviewed by Mjølner.

Time estimates:

  • Documentation of APIs (4 md)
  • Corrections based on feedback from Mjølner (1 md)

Total: 5 md

The following have been punted:

  • White Paper (medium priority)

    • A "product specification", not for developers or end-users, illustrating high-level architecture - an overview of capabilities for non-technical people.
  • Documentation of:
    • LDAP API
  • Design Documentation (low priority)

    • Fedora setup and use
    • Summa integration (digital object bundle, OAI, playback disseminators)
    • GUI developer documentation
    • Validation tool documentation

Checklist For Working On An Action

The Life Cycle of an Action:

  • Assign people for action definition: Done at start of iteration status meeting. Fill out Assigned

  • Define the action: Describe information about what is to be done and how. Fill out Tasks Addressed and Time Estimated.

  • Review the definition: Get another project group member to review the action definition, and update it.

  • Assign people for action implementation: Done by project manager, usually the same persons who wrote the definition. Fill out Assigned and Prev assigned if new persons are assigned.

  • Implement the action: See details below

  • Review the action: Get another project group member to review what is implemented (code and documentation), and update it.

  • Finish the action: Change the status to "Finished" and update the "time used" field on the action page.

Please make sure that you address the below issues, when working on an action:

  • Update the state of the action to "In Progress" when you start working on it.
  • Check if the tasks addressed by this action have their status set to "In Progress". If that is not the case, then change the state of them.
  • Keep track of how much time that has been spent working on the action. If it addresses more than one task, then make a note on the action page about how much of the elapsed time that has been spent on the individual tasks. Hint: Continually updating the "Time used" field will make it easier for you.

  • Update the "Progress History" and documentation pages of each task addressed by this action when appropriate. This depends on the situation, but in general, the task pages should hold all important related information about the work done, experiences gathered, identified requirements and so on.

ActionSystemDocumentation (last edited 2010-03-17 13:08:52 by localhost)