Differences between revisions 23 and 106 (spanning 83 versions)
Revision 23 as of 2009-09-30 13:48:00
Size: 1459
Editor: ek
Comment:
Revision 106 as of 2010-03-17 13:12:46
Size: 2196
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
=== HypotheticalWorkflow === ## page was renamed from Analyze Workflow
## page was renamed from HypotheticalWorkflow
== Analyse Workflow ==
Line 3: Line 5:
The following description of a workflow is based on internationally acknowledged ideas of how an archive should handle accession. It has not yet been entirely implemented at SB - mainly because of lack of resources. ''[under construction]''
Line 5: Line 7:
Basis for the description is a collection called ''Åstedet : Arbejdererindringer fra Århus''. The media is DAT audio cassettes and the content is interviews with working men and women not only about their working life but also about childhood, youth etc. The tapes were recordede from 19xx to 19xx and was donated to Statsbiblioteket in 19xx. === Introduction ===
The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata.
Line 7: Line 10:
'''Receipt''' This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
=== Existing Workflow ===
Line 9: Line 13:
Make a short deccription of the collection. E.g. Where do the collecion come from, what are the agreements abbout it, how many items, what kind of items, A look at the digital project at SB ([[Projects at SB]]) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images

=== Weak points ===


=== Optimal Workflow ===


 * '''Acquisition''':
 Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc.
Line 11: Line 24:
On ceceipt the tapes shall be kept separate from the rest of the collections in the archive until it is examined if they are infected by mould or other kind of contamination, and if that is the case the pollution must be eliminated.  * '''Cataloguing the physical item''':
 Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there already exist a record of this item then copy it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.
Line 13: Line 27:
As soon as possible after receipt the collection has to be recorded.

'''Cataloguing'''

'''Digitization'''
 * '''Metadata for the digital file''':
 Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record.
 Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI.
Line 23: Line 34:
Juha Henriksson and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2009?) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
Line 25: Line 35:
Kulturarvsstyrelsen (2007) ''Retningslinjer for bevaring og håndtering af kulturarvsgenstande'' http://www.kulturarv.dk/forvaltning/museumsdrift/vejledninger/bevaring/index.jsp International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) ''Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies''. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley.

Jong, Annemieke de (2003) ''Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction''. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid.

Analyse Workflow

[under construction]

Introduction

The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata.

This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/

Existing Workflow

A look at the digital project at SB (Projects at SB) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images

Weak points

Optimal Workflow

  • Acquisition: Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc.

  • Cataloguing the physical item: Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there already exist a record of this item then copy it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.

  • Metadata for the digital file: Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI.

References

International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley.

Jong, Annemieke de (2003) Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid.

Analyse Workflow (last edited 2010-03-17 13:12:46 by localhost)