|
Size: 1831
Comment:
|
Size: 2162
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| === HypotheticalWorkflow === | ## page was renamed from Analyze Workflow ## page was renamed from HypotheticalWorkflow == Analyse Workflow == |
| Line 3: | Line 5: |
| The following description of a workflow is based on internationally acknowledged guidelines for handling accession. At SB we do not entirely follow these guidelines - mainly because of lack of resources. | === Introduction === The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata. |
| Line 5: | Line 8: |
| The workflow is based on the scenario that a new donation has just arrived. But almost the same workflow can be used for collections that have been stored at SB for years, but which are now to be digitised. | This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/ === Existing Workflow === |
| Line 7: | Line 11: |
| The Workflow has three headlines: ''Receipt'', ''Cataloguing'', ''Digitisation''. | A look at the digital project at SB (["Projects at SB"]) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images |
| Line 9: | Line 13: |
| '''Receipt''': What to do when you get a new collection, or, get a collection from the store in order to digitise it. | === Weak points === |
| Line 11: | Line 15: |
| Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc. | === Optimal Workflow === * '''Acquisition''': Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc. |
| Line 13: | Line 22: |
| When we are talking about elderly material, the next step is to keep the tapes separate from the rest of the collections in the archive until it is examined if they are infected by mould or other kind of contamination, and if that is the case the pollution must be eliminated. | * '''Cataloguing the physical item''': Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there exist a record of this item then reuse it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised. |
| Line 15: | Line 25: |
| '''Cataloguing''': What kind of records do you need. Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there exist a record of this item then reuse it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised. '''Digitisation''': |
* '''Metadata for the digital file''': Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI. |
| Line 25: | Line 32: |
| Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/ | |
| Line 27: | Line 33: |
| Kulturarvsstyrelsen (2007) ''Retningslinjer for bevaring og håndtering af kulturarvsgenstande'' http://www.kulturarv.dk/forvaltning/museumsdrift/vejledninger/bevaring/index.jsp | International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) ''Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies''. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley. Jong, Annemieke de (2003) ''Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction''. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid. |
Analyse Workflow
Introduction
The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata.
This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
Existing Workflow
A look at the digital project at SB (["Projects at SB"]) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images
Weak points
Optimal Workflow
Acquisition: Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc.
Cataloguing the physical item: Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there exist a record of this item then reuse it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.
Metadata for the digital file: Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI.
References
International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley.
Jong, Annemieke de (2003) Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid.