|
Size: 2610
Comment:
|
← Revision 106 as of 2010-03-17 13:12:46 ⇥
Size: 2196
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| === Existing Workflows === List of previous and existing digital projects: === Need of changes === |
== Analyse Workflow == |
| Line 7: | Line 5: |
| The most important change is that we need to be consistent in our cataloguing policy: A physical item must always be catalogued to our | ''[under construction]'' |
| Line 9: | Line 7: |
| === Common denominator === | === Introduction === The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata. |
| Line 11: | Line 10: |
| === Analyse Workflow === | This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/ === Existing Workflow === |
| Line 13: | Line 13: |
| The workflow is based on the scenario that a new donation has just arrived. But almost the same workflow can be used for a collection that has been stored at SB for years, and now it is going to be digitised. | A look at the digital project at SB ([[Projects at SB]]) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images |
| Line 15: | Line 15: |
| The workflow is not concerned about the technical processes of the digitisation itself, e.g. Preparation of tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion. Instead can be referred to Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/ | === Weak points === |
| Line 17: | Line 17: |
| The Workflow has three headlines: ''Receipt'', ''Cataloguing'', ''Digitisation''. | |
| Line 19: | Line 18: |
| '''Receipt''': What to do when you get a new collection, or, get a collection from the store in order to digitise it? | === Optimal Workflow === |
| Line 21: | Line 20: |
| Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc. | * '''Acquisition''': Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc. |
| Line 23: | Line 24: |
| When we are talking about elderly material, the next step is to keep the tapes separate from the rest of the collections in the archive until it is examined if they are infected by mould or other kind of contamination, and if that is the case the pollution must be eliminated. | * '''Cataloguing the physical item''': Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there already exist a record of this item then copy it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised. |
| Line 25: | Line 27: |
| '''Cataloguing''': What kind of records do you need? Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there exist a record of this item then reuse it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised. '''Digitisation''': Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the cross-over from danMarc2 to Dublin Core is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI. |
* '''Metadata for the digital file''': Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI. |
| Line 37: | Line 34: |
| Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/ | |
| Line 39: | Line 35: |
| Kulturarvsstyrelsen (2007) ''Retningslinjer for bevaring og håndtering af kulturarvsgenstande'' http://www.kulturarv.dk/forvaltning/museumsdrift/vejledninger/bevaring/index.jsp | International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) ''Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies''. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley. Jong, Annemieke de (2003) ''Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction''. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid. |
Analyse Workflow
[under construction]
Introduction
The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata.
This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
Existing Workflow
A look at the digital project at SB (Projects at SB) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images
Weak points
Optimal Workflow
Acquisition: Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc.
Cataloguing the physical item: Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there already exist a record of this item then copy it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.
Metadata for the digital file: Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI.
References
International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley.
Jong, Annemieke de (2003) Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid.