Differences between revisions 70 and 71
Revision 70 as of 2009-10-02 08:55:38
Size: 2824
Editor: ek
Comment:
Revision 71 as of 2009-10-02 08:58:09
Size: 2856
Editor: ek
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
The most important change is to catalogue all the physical items. Best practice is to do it on receipt (as we do with cd's and dvd's) and if that haven't been done, then do it before digitising. The most important change is to start cataloguing all the physical items on receipt (as we do with cd's and dvd's). That is not the case with all the audiovisual material, then we at least should be doing it before digitising.

Analyse Workflow

This workflow is not concerned about the technical processes of the digitisation itself, e.g. Preparation of tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion. Instead can be referred to Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/

Existing Workflows

List of previous and existing digital projects:

Need of changes

The most important change is to start cataloguing all the physical items on receipt (as we do with cd's and dvd's). That is not the case with all the audiovisual material, then we at least should be doing it before digitising.

Common denominator

The common demoniator is the way we handle the items when we 1) on receipt 2) cataloguing the physical item 3) add the necessary metadata to the digital file

Optimal Workflow

The workflow is based on the scenario that a new donation has just arrived. But almost the same workflow can be used for a collection that has been stored at SB for years, and now it is going to be digitised.

  • On Receipt: What to do when you get a new collection, or, get a collection from the store in order to digitise it? Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc. When we are talking about elderly material, the next step is to keep the tapes separate from the rest of the collections in the archive until it is examined if they are infected by mould or other kind of contamination, and if that is the case the pollution must be eliminated.

  • Cataloguing the physical item: What kind of records do you need? Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there exist a record of this item then reuse it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.

  • Metadata for the digital file: Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the cross-over from danMarc2 to Dublin Core is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI.

References

Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/

Kulturarvsstyrelsen (2007) Retningslinjer for bevaring og håndtering af kulturarvsgenstande http://www.kulturarv.dk/forvaltning/museumsdrift/vejledninger/bevaring/index.jsp

Analyse Workflow (last edited 2010-03-17 13:12:46 by localhost)