Differences between revisions 78 and 106 (spanning 28 versions)
Revision 78 as of 2009-10-02 11:12:26
Size: 2748
Editor: ek
Comment:
Revision 106 as of 2010-03-17 13:12:46
Size: 2196
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
=== Analyse Workflow ===
This workflow is not concerned about the technical processes of the digitisation itself, e.g. Preparation of tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion. Instead can be referred to Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
=== Existing Workflows ===
== Analyse Workflow ==
Line 7: Line 5:
List of previous and existing digitisation projects:
=== Need of changes ===
''[under construction]''
Line 10: Line 7:
The most important change is to start cataloguing all the physical items at acquisition (as we do with cd's and dvd's). Unfortunately, we have not done that with all the audiovisual material, but then we should be doing it before digitising. === Introduction ===
The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata.
Line 12: Line 10:
=== Common denominator === This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
=== Existing Workflow ===
Line 14: Line 13:
The common demoniator is the way we handle the items 1) at acquisition 2) when cataloguing the physical item 3) when adding the necessary metadata to the digital file A look at the digital project at SB ([[Projects at SB]]) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images

=== Weak points ===
Line 18: Line 20:
The workflow is based on the scenario that a new donation has just arrived. But almost the same workflow can be used for a collection that has been stored at SB for years, and now is going to be digitised.
Line 22: Line 23:
 When we are talking about elderly material, the next step is to keep the tapes separate from the rest of the collections in the archive until it is examined if they are infected by
 mould or other kind of contamination, and if that is the case the pollution must be eliminated.
 
Line 26: Line 25:
 Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there exist a record of this item then reuse it, make the needed changes and export it to the  library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.  Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there already exist a record of this item then copy it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.
Line 29: Line 28:
 Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the cross-over from danMarc2 to Dublin Core is part of the automatic process of importing the record.  Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record.
Line 35: Line 34:
Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) ''Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow'' http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/
Line 37: Line 35:
Kulturarvsstyrelsen (2007) ''Retningslinjer for bevaring og håndtering af kulturarvsgenstande'' http://www.kulturarv.dk/forvaltning/museumsdrift/vejledninger/bevaring/index.jsp International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) ''Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies''. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley.

Jong, Annemieke de (2003) ''Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction''. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid.

Analyse Workflow

[under construction]

Introduction

The focus of this workflow is to describe the outcome of the digitization process - the digital file and the matching metadata.

This workflow is not concerned about the processes concerning Preparation of the tape, Preparation of the machine, A/D-conversion, etc. There are many good description of this, one can be found here: Henriksson, Juha and Nadja Wallaszkovits (2008) Audio Tape Digitisation Workflow http://www.jazzpoparkisto.net/audio/

Existing Workflow

A look at the digital project at SB (Projects at SB) shows that we have digitized many different kinds of media, e.g. sound, moving images, text and images

Weak points

Optimal Workflow

  • Acquisition: Make a short description of the collection: Where does the collection come from, what are the agreements about it, how many items are there and what kind of media is it, etc.

  • Cataloguing the physical item: Make a catalogue record of the physical item for the libary database using danMARC2. If there already exist a record of this item then copy it, make the needed changes and export it to the library database. This record can be used to create eg. a Dublin Core record when the item is going to be digitised.

  • Metadata for the digital file: Find the bibliographical record in the library database and import a copy to DOMS-GUI. It is assumed that the danMarc2 to Dublin Core crosswalk is part of the automatic process of importing the record. Digitise the item and add the necessary technical metadata to the bibliographical metadata via the GUI.

References

International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (2009) Guidelines on the Production and Preservation of Digital Audio Objects: Standards Recommended, Practices and Strategies. IASA-TC04. 2nd edition/ edited by Kevin Bradley.

Jong, Annemieke de (2003) Metadata in the audiovisual production environment: an introduction. Nederlands Instituut vor Beeld en Geluid.

Analyse Workflow (last edited 2010-03-17 13:12:46 by localhost)