## The heading should have the form: "2008-01-21 Iteration 7 Status Meeting"

= 2008-10-06 Iteration 13 Status =

## ADD LINK to the agenda here.
  [[Agendas/2008-10-06 Iteration 13 status|Agenda]]

== 0. Formalities ==

Present: ABR, EK, JRG, BAM

Present half of the meeting: TSH

Absent: KFC

Minute: BAM

== 1. Iteration 13 ==

=== Action Metadata Standards (Priority 1) ===
 * For the descriptive metadata: qualified Dublin Core

For preservation metadata, not easy. EK attended Premis meeting. Status: good for images, but audio and video seem to be lacking behind. EK has been looking at 'recommended elements'-list from Australian library; will send URL.

Question: what metadata is automatically generated and what is then missing?

Preservation metadata can be divided into:
   * generation descriptive - mostly from Quadriga and similar
   * file descriptive - mostly from characterisation tools

We still haven't decided a standard. And we are not sure what information Mjølner is missing. We need at least one internal meeting: '''EK, ABR, JRG meeting now 2008-10-06 11.00'''. And we need a meeting with Mjølner.

=== Action Import Export APIs (Priority 2) ===
KFC knows most about this action, and he is on holiday. None of the other action depend directly on this, so we will postpone this action 'till next week.

=== Action WSDL2 Java (Priority 3) ===
TSH is still busy with Pindar. ABR will update description with: Change testbed to give copies of WSDLs rather than genrating new ones. BAM will review and start action Tuesday.

=== Action System Documentation (Priority 4) ===
JRG is 'almost done'. API-A + API-M done. Still missing some return data structure descriptions. And still missing WSDL description (highest priority) and ofcourse review.

=== Action Update Datamodel Documentation (Priority 5) ===
ABR 'almost done'. Including 'thoughts behind' or 'intended use of DOMS'; see [[ActionUpdateDatamodelDocumentation]]. Missing 1-2 md + review (of a lot of pages).

=== Action View Datastream (Priority 6) ===
ABR and KFC have a plan! JRG will review action description, which has four suggested solution models. ABR says the solution is model 5.

== 2. AOB ==
What is our plans on Summa integration? and when?

The Summa integration work has been postponed til after the GUI work...