|
Size: 1461
Comment:
|
Size: 1461
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| -- The Mjølner side -- | == The Mjølner side == |
| Line 19: | Line 19: |
| -- The DOMS side -- | == The DOMS side == |
2008-12-04 Mjølner developer meeting Henrik, Asger and Jeppe
The Mjølner side
Mjølner has now
- Parsed enummerations
- Delete done
- Working text areas
They will send errors that occur at upload to bitstorage.
Our wish about incoming relations on the relation-tab were given to Mjølner.
At the end of our cooperation they will deliver as a war file, without JBoss, but will of course include source (with sparse javadoc, but the most neccessary) and they will include Eclipse configurations.
The DOMS side
It was mentioned that DOMS developers still need to discuss and make a choice regarding "collection templates".
- Talk about inverse relations, which Mjølner have not thought about. They are not sure they will make it in time. (We send a query after the meeting)
- They would like documentation (more than one line) of hasLicense on the wiki.
- Yearbook templates don't have the needed isTemplateFor
- CM_DOMS isTemplateFor OWL
- Validator message stuff..
The solution to the problem with installing a Summa in Mjølner's environment will most likely be the following: Mjølner will test locally with the interfaces to Summa that are given to them. We will do a few tests with a real Summa under Linux at SB.
- Mjølner needs a ("final") example of the Summa response, which they can code against.