Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2008-06-26 12:26:13
Size: 2475
Editor: kfc
Comment: Created by the PackagePages action.
Revision 2 as of 2010-03-17 13:09:18
Size: 2475
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 8: Line 8:
["Technical"] and ["Ingest 2"] (old wiki pages) contain discussion/recommendation documents. [[Technical]] and [[Ingest 2]] (old wiki pages) contain discussion/recommendation documents.
Line 11: Line 11:
  * Detailed descriptions are missing – doing these depends on typesystem ["TaskA.2.1"] and metadata ["TaskA.2.3"] decisions   * Detailed descriptions are missing – doing these depends on typesystem [[TaskA.2.1]] and metadata [[TaskA.2.3]] decisions
Line 21: Line 21:
See ["TaskC.1AnalysisDocumentDetails#FormatDefinitions"] See [[TaskC.1AnalysisDocumentDetails#FormatDefinitions]]

Analysis of Base Types for DOMS

Technical and Ingest 2 (old wiki pages) contain discussion/recommendation documents.

  • Contains a list of the types inherent in the DOMS
  • Contains top level descriptions of these types
  • Detailed descriptions are missing – doing these depends on typesystem TaskA.2.1 and metadata TaskA.2.3 decisions

When addressing this task, we should also be addressing the following TDR requirements:

  • Format definitions required, note that the intended usage of the format is relevant as well, use standard format registries: B2.1, B2.2, B3.3, R48, R62, R73

See TaskC.1AnalysisDocumentDetails#FormatDefinitions

Prerequisites and Assumptions

The estimation of this task is based on these notes, which also should be taken into consideration when implementing the task:

BAM: No comments.

TE: Down to earth-skemaskrivning

TSH: Konkrete typer impl

MKE: This is only the actual writing down of types def. in A.2.1, Fedora

KFC: Implementer typerne i A.2.1-sprog

TaskA.2.2AnalysisDocument (last edited 2010-03-17 13:09:18 by localhost)