⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2008-06-26 12:26:13
Size: 2475
Comment: Created by the PackagePages action.
|
← Revision 2 as of 2010-03-17 13:09:18 ⇥
Size: 2475
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 8: | Line 8: |
["Technical"] and ["Ingest 2"] (old wiki pages) contain discussion/recommendation documents. | [[Technical]] and [[Ingest 2]] (old wiki pages) contain discussion/recommendation documents. |
Line 11: | Line 11: |
* Detailed descriptions are missing – doing these depends on typesystem ["TaskA.2.1"] and metadata ["TaskA.2.3"] decisions | * Detailed descriptions are missing – doing these depends on typesystem [[TaskA.2.1]] and metadata [[TaskA.2.3]] decisions |
Line 21: | Line 21: |
See ["TaskC.1AnalysisDocumentDetails#FormatDefinitions"] | See [[TaskC.1AnalysisDocumentDetails#FormatDefinitions]] |
Analysis of Base Types for DOMS
Technical and Ingest 2 (old wiki pages) contain discussion/recommendation documents.
- Contains a list of the types inherent in the DOMS
- Contains top level descriptions of these types
Detailed descriptions are missing – doing these depends on typesystem TaskA.2.1 and metadata TaskA.2.3 decisions
When addressing this task, we should also be addressing the following TDR requirements:
- Format definitions required, note that the intended usage of the format is relevant as well, use standard format registries: B2.1, B2.2, B3.3, R48, R62, R73
See TaskC.1AnalysisDocumentDetails#FormatDefinitions
Prerequisites and Assumptions
The estimation of this task is based on these notes, which also should be taken into consideration when implementing the task:
BAM: No comments.
TE: Down to earth-skemaskrivning
TSH: Konkrete typer impl
MKE: This is only the actual writing down of types def. in A.2.1, Fedora
KFC: Implementer typerne i A.2.1-sprog