Differences between revisions 3 and 4

C.1. Identify TDR Requirements

State: In progress

Time used: 1½ md. Note: Time spent before iteration 3 not registered.

Description

Meet with CSR about [http://www.digitalpreservationeurope.eu/ DPE] and any standards or checklists that can be used to identify requirements for trusted digital repositories. This meeting was held on July 5th (2007). The next step is looking through the found requirements and determining which apply and how they apply to the DOMS project (including requirements to logging and access control). This should help us identify and plan for any necessary changes. All notes and links can be found in the [:TaskC.1AnalysisDocument:Analysis Document].
Meet with LC about [http://www.planets-project.eu/ Planets] which might offer practical digital preservation services and tools and probably more requirements. Also, it should be determined if any TDR functionality can be inherited from the Planets project to avoid redundant implementations. How any general requirements apply to the DOMS is a part of this tasks.
Completing this task may result in more open questions, thus, more sub-tasks must be added to ["TaskC"].

Documentation

[:TaskC.1AnalysisDocument:Analysis Document]

Parent task

["TaskC"]

Progress history

PageDicts(Action,Iteration, Time used,Status,Notes,Tasks adressed ~= TaskC.1)

2007-09-24

The analysis document has been updated with all requirements, and tasks have been identified that should address these requirements. We have also had to introduce some new tasks.

Please see the analysis document for more information.

2008-08-28

In connection with ["ActionDataModelTDRRequirements"], we discovered that all references to 'RLG/NARA audit checklist' in the analysis document was to an 'old' version (and the link to this version was dead). The analysis document has now been updated with links to both old and new version. We should take time to go through the revised TRAC: Criteria and Checklist. We could also take a look at the Platter checklist.

-  ⇤ ← Revision 3 as of 2008-08-28 07:15:25 → 
  Size: 3666
  Editor: bam
  Comment: updated with reference to new version of TRAC checklist
+   ← Revision 4 as of 2008-08-28 07:48:40 → ⇥
  Size: 3639
  Editor: bam
  Comment: chaged state back to 'In progress'...
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 5:
-Line 7:
+Line 6:
-Line 9:
+Line 7:
-'''State:''' Done
+'''State:''' In progress
-Line 15:
+Line 13:
-Line 18:
+Line 15:
- * Meet with CSR about [http://www.digitalpreservationeurope.eu/ DPE] and any standards or checklists that can be used to identify requirements for trusted digital repositories. This meeting was held on July 5th (2007). The next step is looking through the found requirements and determining which apply and how they apply to the DOMS project (including requirements to logging and access control). This should help us identify and plan for any necessary changes. All notes and links can be found in the [:TaskC.1AnalysisDocument: Analysis Document].
+ * Meet with CSR about [http://www.digitalpreservationeurope.eu/ DPE] and any standards or checklists that can be used to identify requirements for trusted digital repositories. This meeting was held on July 5th (2007). The next step is looking through the found requirements and determining which apply and how they apply to the DOMS project (including requirements to logging and access control). This should help us identify and plan for any necessary changes. All notes and links can be found in the [:TaskC.1AnalysisDocument:Analysis Document].
-Line 22:
+Line 17:
- * Completing this task may result in more open questions, thus, more sub-tasks must be added to [:TaskC:].
+ * Completing this task may result in more open questions, thus, more sub-tasks must be added to ["TaskC"].
-Line 28:
+Line 21:
-Line 30:
+Line 22:
-Line 35:
+Line 26:
-   * [:TaskC.1AnalysisDocument: Analysis Document]
+ * [:TaskC.1AnalysisDocument:Analysis Document]
-Line 40:
+Line 29:
-Line 42:
+Line 30:
-Line 53:
+Line 40:
-Line 60:
+Line 46:
-In connection with [:ActionDataModelTDRRequirements:], we discovered that all references to 'RLG/NARA audit checklist' in the analysis document was to an 'old' version (and the link to this version was dead). The analysis document has now been updated with links to both old and new version. We should take time to go through the revised TRAC: Criteria and Checklist. We could also take a look at the Platter checklist.
+In connection with ["ActionDataModelTDRRequirements"], we discovered that all references to 'RLG/NARA audit checklist' in the analysis document was to an 'old' version (and the link to this version was dead). The analysis document has now been updated with links to both old and new version. We should take time to go through the revised TRAC: Criteria and Checklist. We could also take a look at the Platter checklist.